We
in the DoD recognize that, as a French philosophe claimed, thinking about death
is like looking at the sun – do it too long and you’ll go blind. Still, we like to live on the edge. So we are delighted to announce a new course
on human mortality.
Topics
to be covered include:
No one dies
alone: the social nature of death. Here we’ll investigate social relations and
personal identity, and the ruptures in these bereavement represents.
Grief: What is it good for? Some aspects of grief may be natural, but
insofar as one can train oneself into it or out of it, what makes most ethical
sense? Is grief a challenge to
well-being or a part of it? What, if any, judgments regarding death
does grief implicitly sanction?
Identity: Who can you be when you can’t be who you
were? Here we’ll investigate the
unmaking of personal identity performed by loss and ask what comes next,
looking at competing accounts of how and whether continuity in personal
identity can be achieved.
Funerals, Part
I: Cost. The great funeral expenditure debate: Are funerals a worrisome waste of resources
(looking at you, Mozi!) or are they necessary and important ethical goods? By what standards ought we evaluate funerary
expenditures?
Funerals, Part
II: Corpse Disposal. We’ll investigate the symbolic duality of the
corpse – its status as foul matter and beloved person – and assay what one
should do about that. Mengzi says if you
throw your parents’ corpses into a ditch, you’ll feel nauseous and wrong, but
is that so?
Funerals, Part
III: Environmental Influence. Given that human practices don’t just
express human values and dispositions, but also shape them, what sorts of
funerary practice are best and best work to promote values and dispositions
we’d want affirmed?
Memory and
Imaginal Relations: The dead are gone,
so now what? Assuming the dead are beyond reach of our
affection, is that the end of the story or are there forms of relation and
ongoing memorialization that serve important ethical and philosophically
therapeutic ends?
Oh, yeah,
you’re going to die too. In which we briefly
consider the less compelling view that the problem
of death is that I’m going to die. As
a gesture at cross-cultural inquiry, we’ll look at some of the abundant Normal
sources that focus exclusively on my own death, whether it’s bad for me, etc.,
etc., and all that. [NB: The semester is jam packed, so chances are
we’ll cut this less interesting section.]
I was trying to think of something witty and/or substantive to say in response to this, but I couldn't. So I'll just say that this post was delightful, and made me bookmark this blog. Thanks for this!
ReplyDelete